Batman is the clear winner here. Nearl all the othrs commit the cardinal sin of putting a tacky picture of the character on the shirt, thus ruining any hopes of replicating the character's costume. And of looking cool on Halloween.
Also, the picture/pose chosen for the Kung Fu costume looks like it was taken from a Chippendale's calendar.
YIN takes their costuming very seriously, I see. XD You're not the only one who, even in early childhood, realized there was something fundamentally wrong about putting the character on a costume that was suppose to -be- the character.
What's really funny is David Carradine was never that buff in Kung Fu. Maybe the artists were inspired by Yukio Mishima, which would be just -wrong- on so many different levels, particularly for a kid's costume.
Due to recent events, I'm limiting comments to google account holders only. Sorry if you're a decent person affected by this but the spam has gotten weird.
Wow. We didn't have Target in Chicago until the 90s. I had no idea they were around since the 70s.
ReplyDeleteI had the Batman one, and some of the Sesame Street Finger Puppets.
ReplyDeleteBatman is the clear winner here. Nearl all the othrs commit the cardinal sin of putting a tacky picture of the character on the shirt, thus ruining any hopes of replicating the character's costume. And of looking cool on Halloween.
ReplyDeleteAlso, the picture/pose chosen for the Kung Fu costume looks like it was taken from a Chippendale's calendar.
Also, 2 Matchbox cars for a buck? Awesome. And they say Walmart is cheap.
ReplyDeleteYIN takes their costuming very seriously, I see. XD You're not the only one who, even in early childhood, realized there was something fundamentally wrong about putting the character on a costume that was suppose to -be- the character.
ReplyDeleteWhat's really funny is David Carradine was never that buff in Kung Fu. Maybe the artists were inspired by Yukio Mishima, which would be just -wrong- on so many different levels, particularly for a kid's costume.