Monday, April 13, 2009

Not even your britches were safe


There is absolutely no need for men's underwear to be this funky, it's plenty funky enough all by it's lonesome.
Those guys could be wearing kevlar vests and those undershirts would still be visible.
at

9 comments:

  1. Wings12954/13/2009 8:50 AM

    The solid colors are passable, although probably a surprising item when they were new.

    But those prints... Wow. Talk about coming out of the closet! Seeing a dude with those on now would be shocking, but can you imagine 30+ years ago??? Yeesh!

    ReplyDelete
  2. John III4/13/2009 9:10 AM

    That is just God-Awful. Maybe only pimps or drug kingpins wore them. "Say hello to my little friend!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. rob!4/13/2009 9:11 AM

    Oh dear god...

    Is it safe for clones to have sex with each other, which this picture clearly implies?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hairball T. Hairball4/13/2009 4:07 PM

    My eyes! My eyes!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Beth4/13/2009 6:47 PM

    Is that a Pyramide du Louvre in his pants or is he just gla....oh jeez. That is just so wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous4/13/2009 10:25 PM

    Wow, they're so hairy. I guess they're the epitome of 70's macho men. Now you don't see one hair on a male model.

    ReplyDelete
  7. blueroc856/04/2009 8:01 PM

    I luv that they tuck their undershirts into their underwear! LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8/03/2009 2:13 PM

    Mr. blonde model is trying to pick out a serious wedgie! Unavoiadable in tight 70's fasion.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous11/03/2009 5:12 PM

    what size chest are those yellow piss catcher's?

    ReplyDelete

Due to recent events, I'm limiting comments to google account holders only. Sorry if you're a decent person affected by this but the spam has gotten weird.